Home
Home Sun Dec 05, 2004
valign=top Research ethics

valign=top IMSA Mentorship Program

valign=top Contest to find out the abbreviation and logo of the Network of Youth Excellence

valign=top Mon Dec 13, 2004
    WAYS 1st General Conference


 Number of visiors: 
619


Research ethics

Nowdays more and more questions emerge relating to scientific research, which should be answered on common and universal principles. Actually, it is quite hard to come to an agreement on this principles, thus we decided to take the initiative in a discussion on this issue. Please find the Helsinki Declaration and the Nuremberg Code below, to have a basis on the subject. To contribute to the issue, please visit the Forum.       

 

DECLARATION OF HELSINKI
 
Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects
 
         Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964
         amended by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975
                35th World Medical Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983,
            and the 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989.
 
 
INTRODUCTION
 
It is the mission of the physician to safeguard the health of the people. His or her knowledge and conscience are dedicated to the fulfillment of this mission.
 
The Declaration of Geneva of the World Medical Association binds the physician with the words:
"The health of my patient will be my first consideration", and the International Code of Medical Ethics declares that "A physician shall act only in the patient's interest when providing medical care which might have the effect of weakening the physical and mental condition of the patient."
 
The purpose of biomedical research involving human subjects must be to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and prophylactic procedures and the understanding of the aetiology and pathogenesis of disease.
 
In current medical practice most diagnostic, therapeutic or prophylactic procedures involve hazards. This applies especially to biomedical research.
 
Medical progress is based on research which ultimately must rest in part on experimentation involving human subjects.
 
In the field of biomedical research a fundamental distinction must be recognized between medical research in which the aim is essentially diagnostic or therapeutic for a patient, and medical research, the essential object of which is purely scientific and without direct diagnostic or therapeutic value to the person subjected to the research.
 
Special caution must be exercised in the conduct of research which may affect the environment, and the welfare of animals used for research must be respected.
 
Because it is essential that the results of laboratory experiments be applied to human beings to further scientific knowledge and to help suffering humanity, the World Medical Association has prepared the following recommendations as a guide to every physician in biomedical research involving human subjects. They should be kept under review in the future. It must be stressed that the standards as drafted are only a guide to physicians all over the world. Physicians are not relieved from criminal, civil and ethical responsibilities under the laws of their own countries.
 
I. BASIC PRINCIPLES
 
1. Biomedical research involving human subjects must conform to generally accepted scientific principles and should be based on adequately performed laboratory and animal experimentation and on a thorough knowledge of the scientific literature.
 
2. The design and performance of each experimental procedure involving human subjects should be clearly formulated in an experimental protocol which should be transmitted for consideration, comment and guidance to a specially appointed committee independent of the investigator and the sponsor provided that this independent committee is in conformity with the laws and regulations of the country in which the research experiment is performed.
 
3. Biomedical research involving human subjects should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons and under the supervision of a clinically competent medical person. The responsibility for the human subject must always rest with a medically qualified person and never rest on the subject of the research, even though the subject has given his or her consent.
 
4. Biomedical research involving human subjects cannot legitimately be carried out unless the importance of the objective is in proportion to the inherent risk to the subject.
 
5. Every biomedical research project involving human subjects should be preceded by careful assessment of predictable risks in comparison with foreseeable benefits to the subject or to others. Concern for the interests of the subject must always prevail over the interest of science and society.
 
6. The right of the research subject to safeguard his or her integrity must always be respected. Every precaution should be taken to respect the privacy of the subject and to minimize the impact of the study on the subject's physical and mental integrity and on the personality of the subject.
 
7. Physicians should abstain from engaging in research projects involving human subjects unless they are satisfied that the hazards involved are believed to be predictable. Physicians should cease any investigation if the hazards are found to outweigh the potential benefits.
 
8. In publication of the results of his or her research, the physician is obliged to preserve the accuracy of the results. Reports of experimentation not in accordance with the principles laid down in this Declaration should not be accepted for publication.
 
9. In any research on human beings, each potential subject must be adequately informed of the aims, methods, anticipated benefits and potential hazards of the study and the discomfort it may entail. He or she should be informed that he or she is at liberty to abstain from participation in the study and that he or she is free to withdraw his or her consent to participation at any time. The physician should then obtain the subject's freely-given informed consent, preferably in writing.
 
10. When obtaining informed consent for the research project the physician should be particularly cautious if the subject is in a dependent relationship to him or her or may consent under duress. In that case the informed consent should be obtained by a physician who is not engaged in the investigation and who is completely independent of this official relationship.
 
11. In case of legal incompetence, informed consent should be obtained from the legal guardian in accordance with national legislation. Where physical or mental incapacity makes it impossible to obtain informed consent, or when the subject is a minor, permission from the responsible relative replaces that of the subject in accordance with national legislation. Whenever the minor child is in fact able to give a consent, the minor's consent must be obtained in addition to the consent of the minor's legal guardian.
 
12. The research protocol should always contain a statement of the ethical considerations involved and should indicate that the principles enunciated in the present Declaration are complied with.
 
II. MEDICAL RESEARCH COMBINED WITH PROFESSIONAL CARE
 
(Clinical Research)
 
1. In the treatment of the sick person the physician must be free to use a new diagnostic and therapeutic measure, if in his or her judgment it offers hope of saving life, re-establishing health or alleviating suffering.
 
2. The potential benefits, hazards and discomfort of a new method should be weighed against the advantages of the best current diagnostic and therapeutic methods.
 
3. In any medical study, every patient - including those of a control group, if any - should be assured of the best proven diagnostic and therapeutic method.
 
4. The refusal of the Patient to participate in the study must never interfere with the
physician-patient relationship.
 
5. If the physician considers it essential not to obtain informed consent the specific reasons for this proposal should be stated in the experimental protocol for transmission to the independent committee (I. 2).
 
6. The physician can combine medical research with professional care, the objective being the acquisition of new medical knowledge, only to the extent that medical research is justified by its potential diagnostic or therapeutic value for the patient.
 
III. NON- THERAPEUTIC BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS
 
(Non-clinical biomedical research)
 
1. In the purely scientific application of medical research carried out on a human being, it is the duty of the physician to remain the protector of the life and health of that person on whom biomedical research is being carried out.
 
2. The subjects should be volunteers - either healthy persons or patients for whom the experimental design is not related to the patient's illness.
 
3. The investigator or the investigating team should discontinue the research if in his/her or their judgment it may, if continued, be harmful to the individual.
 
4. In research on man, the interest of science and society should never take precedence over considerations related to the well-being of the subject.
 
 

THE NUREMBERG CODE

 
1.The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
 
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of
constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an
affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
 
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
 
2.The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
 
3.The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
 
4.The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
 
5.No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except,  perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
 
6.The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
 
7.Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
 
8.The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
 
9.During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
 
10.During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of  the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the
experimental subject.
 
["Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10", Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]
 
 
 
 



 Board

 Executive Board

 Secretariat
valign=top  NATO

valign=top  FEBS

valign=top  EU

valign=top  HHMI

valign=top  IUBMB

valign=top  EU

valign=top  FEBS

valign=top  NATO

valign=top  UNESCO


Sitemap